More than 1.7 Trillion USD of offshore investments are held at swiss banks, according to Swiss weekly newspaper NZZ am SONNTAG
The figures come from a report by the Swiss Bankers Association which estimates up to 2.9 trillion swiss francs of ‘offshore’ wealth is managed by Swiss banks out of a total 5.2 trillion.
It is thought that the majority of this figure is composed of private rather than institutional investors
“In fact private persons are behind many institutional investors,” said Swiss Bankers Association spokesman Thomas Sutter.
The extent of personal wealth stored in swiss offshore banks is almost twice as much as originally thought. This could have a huge impact on the outflow of assets from swiss banks, after news of Switzerland’s agreement to adopt OECD standards for transparency and information exchange last Friday.
The rules are set to open up Swiss bank secrecy, allowing information to be passed on to foreign authorities in cases of tax evasion. Although Switzerland has said it limit such information exchange to ’specific and concrete requests’ many foreign investors may well feel they do not have the same level of protection previously offered.
Switzerland will enter into negotiations soon with up to 70 countries in order to enforce the new regulations but allow a fair transition period, according to foreign minister Micheline Calmy-Rey (allowing investors a chance to withdraw).
Since signing on to the OECD, the Swiss will be making sure other tax havens follow suit. Singapore, Austria, Liechtenstein and Luxembourg have already made similar arrangements.
“Now Switzerland is no longer on the defensive in tax matters and no longer needs to hide. On the contrary, we can confidently demand other tax and financial centres to meet these international standards too,” Calmey-Rey told NZZ in an interview.
With Switzerland ‘easing’ its bank secrecy, offshore investors are running out of jurisdictions which can claim to guarantee their privacy. Panama and Honk Kong to date are two major banking centres which have not agreed to OECD interference. Smaller nations with offshore banks that have stayed under the international radar may also be options.